multimodal benchmark
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelST | Score91.8% | Percentile100.0% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score88.0% | Percentile87.5% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelMI | Score86.7% | Percentile75.0% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score86.5% | Percentile62.5% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score84.3% | Percentile50.0% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelMI | Score81.9% | Percentile37.5% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelDE | Score80.3% | Percentile25.0% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelDE | Score79.6% | Percentile12.5% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelDE | Score69.2% | Percentile0.0% | Participants9 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mmbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Step3-VL-10B currently leads MMBench with 91.8%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MMBench measures and how its scores work.
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMBench.
Step3-VL-10B is currently ranked first with 91.8%.
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.