multimodal benchmark
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | ST | 91.8% | 100.0% | 9 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 88.0% | 87.5% | 9 | C | |
| 03 | MI | 86.7% | 75.0% | 9 | C | |
| 04 | AC | 86.5% | 62.5% | 9 | C | |
| 05 | AC | 84.3% | 50.0% | 9 | C | |
| 06 | MI | 81.9% | 37.5% | 9 | C | |
| 07 | DE | 80.3% | 25.0% | 9 | C | |
| 08 | DE | 79.6% | 12.5% | 9 | C | |
| 09 | DE | 69.2% | 0.0% | 9 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What MMBench measures and how its scores work.
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMBench.
Step3-VL-10B is currently ranked first with 91.8%.
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.