math benchmark
MathVista-Mini is a smaller version of the MathVista benchmark that evaluates mathematical reasoning in visual contexts. It consists of examples derived from multimodal datasets involving mathematics, combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess foundation models' ability to solve problems requiring both visual understanding and mathematical reasoning.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMA | Score90.1% | Percentile100.0% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score87.8% | Percentile95.7% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score87.4% | Percentile91.3% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score87.4% | Percentile87.0% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score86.4% | Percentile82.6% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score86.2% | Percentile78.3% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAC | Score85.9% | Percentile73.9% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score85.8% | Percentile69.6% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelAC | Score84.9% | Percentile65.2% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelAC | Score83.8% | Percentile60.9% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelAC | Score81.9% | Percentile56.5% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelAC | Score81.4% | Percentile52.2% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelAC | Score80.1% | Percentile47.8% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelAC | Score79.5% | Percentile43.5% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelAC | Score77.2% | Percentile39.1% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelAC | Score74.8% | Percentile34.8% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelAC | Score74.7% | Percentile30.4% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelAC | Score73.7% | Percentile26.1% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelAC | Score70.5% | Percentile21.7% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelLA | Score68.5% | Percentile17.4% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelAC | Score68.2% | Percentile13.0% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelGO | Score67.6% | Percentile8.7% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank23 | ModelGO | Score62.9% | Percentile4.3% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank24 | ModelGO | Score50.0% | Percentile0.0% | Participants24 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mathvista-mini AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Kimi K2.5 currently leads MathVista-Mini with 90.1%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MathVista-Mini measures and how its scores work.
MathVista-Mini is a smaller version of the MathVista benchmark that evaluates mathematical reasoning in visual contexts. It consists of examples derived from multimodal datasets involving mathematics, combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess foundation models' ability to solve problems requiring both visual understanding and mathematical reasoning.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MathVista-Mini.
Kimi K2.5 is currently ranked first with 90.1%.
MathVista-Mini is a smaller version of the MathVista benchmark that evaluates mathematical reasoning in visual contexts. It consists of examples derived from multimodal datasets involving mathematics, combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess foundation models' ability to solve problems requiring both visual understanding and mathematical reasoning.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
24 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.