llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Internal Research Debugging Evaluation Leaderboard

The Internal Research Debugging Evaluation measures whether models can debug 41 real bugs from internal OpenAI research experiments (plus alignment-auditing tasks), where the original solutions took experienced researchers hours to days. Passing corresponds to providing assistance that would unblock the user, including partial root-cause explanations or fixes.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Internal Research Debugging Evaluation Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore68.3%Percentile100.0%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore67.8%Percentile50.0%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore50.8%Percentile0.0%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

Internal Research Debugging Evaluation Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol68.3%Rank #2GPT-5.6 Terra67.8%Rank #3GPT-5.6 Luna50.8%

Internal Research Debugging Evaluation Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Internal Research Debugging Evaluation

The Top AI Models for Internal Research Debugging Evaluation

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis internal research debugging evaluation AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Score
    68.3%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 27 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Internal Research Debugging Evaluation, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
    Score
    67.8%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Internal Research Debugging Evaluation, not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
    Score
    50.8%
    Price
    $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 49 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Internal Research Debugging Evaluation, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Internal Research Debugging Evaluation

GPT-5.6 Sol currently leads Internal Research Debugging Evaluation with 68.3%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol68.3% · $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2GPT-5.6 Terra67.8% · $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3GPT-5.6 Luna50.8% · $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens

What is Internal Research Debugging Evaluation?

What Internal Research Debugging Evaluation measures and how its scores work.

The Internal Research Debugging Evaluation measures whether models can debug 41 real bugs from internal OpenAI research experiments (plus alignment-auditing tasks), where the original solutions took experienced researchers hours to days. Passing corresponds to providing assistance that would unblock the user, including partial root-cause explanations or fixes.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Internal Research Debugging Evaluation
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
internal-research-debugging-evaluation|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Internal Research Debugging Evaluation.

Which model scores highest on Internal Research Debugging Evaluation?

GPT-5.6 Sol is currently ranked first with 68.3%.

What does Internal Research Debugging Evaluation measure?

The Internal Research Debugging Evaluation measures whether models can debug 41 real bugs from internal OpenAI research experiments (plus alignment-auditing tasks), where the original solutions took experienced researchers hours to days. Passing corresponds to providing assistance that would unblock the user, including partial root-cause explanations or fixes.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.