llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

InfoVQAtest Leaderboard

InfoVQA test set with infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models12
Model coverage12
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

InfoVQAtest Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

12 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore92.6%Percentile100.0%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.5%Percentile90.9%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.2%Percentile81.8%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3 VL 32B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore89.2%Percentile72.7%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore87.0%Percentile63.6%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.0%Percentile54.5%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore86.0%Percentile45.5%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen2-VL-72B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore84.5%Percentile36.4%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3 VL 8B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.1%Percentile27.3%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank10ModelACQwen3 VL 4B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore83.0%Percentile18.2%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore82.0%Percentile9.1%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank12ModelACQwen3 VL 4B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore80.3%Percentile0.0%Participants12EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

InfoVQAtest Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Kimi K2.592.6%Rank #2Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking89.5%Rank #3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct89.2%Rank #4Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking89.2%

InfoVQAtest Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

InfoVQAtest

The Top AI Models for InfoVQAtest

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis infovqatest AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
    Score
    92.6%
    Price
    $0.60 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 12 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures InfoVQAtest, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    89.5%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 12 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures InfoVQAtest, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    89.2%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 12 compared models
    • 82th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures InfoVQAtest, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    89.2%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 12 compared models
    • 73th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures InfoVQAtest, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Qwen3 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    87.0%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 12 compared models
    • 64th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures InfoVQAtest, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for InfoVQAtest

Kimi K2.5 currently leads InfoVQAtest with 92.6%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Kimi K2.592.6% · $0.60 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking89.5%Benchmark rank #3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct89.2%

What is InfoVQAtest?

What InfoVQAtest measures and how its scores work.

InfoVQA test set with infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
InfoVQAtest
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
infovqatest|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about InfoVQAtest.

Which model scores highest on InfoVQAtest?

Kimi K2.5 is currently ranked first with 92.6%.

What does InfoVQAtest measure?

InfoVQA test set with infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

12 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.