reasoning benchmark
HumanEval+ Leaderboard
Enhanced version of HumanEval that extends the original test cases by 80x using EvalPlus framework for rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code functional correctness, detecting previously undetected wrong code
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Models10
Model coverage10
MetricScore
EvidenceB
HumanEval+ Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelMI | Score92.9% | Percentile100.0% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelMI | Score92.3% | Percentile88.9% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelIB | Score86.1% | Percentile77.8% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelIB | Score86.1% | Percentile66.7% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelMI | Score82.8% | Percentile55.6% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelIB | Score78.3% | Percentile44.4% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelXI | Score75.6% | Percentile33.3% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score52.4% | Percentile22.2% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelAC | Score51.2% | Percentile11.1% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelBA | Score25.0% | Percentile0.0% | Participants10 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
HumanEval+ Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
HumanEval+ Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for HumanEval+
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis humaneval+ AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
- 01MIPhi 4 ReasoningMicrosoft
- Score
- 92.9%
- Price
- $0.13 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens
Strengths
- Ranks #1 of 10 compared models
- 100th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HumanEval+, not total model capability
- 02MIPhi 4 Reasoning PlusMicrosoft
- Score
- 92.3%
- Price
- $0.13 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens
Strengths
- Ranks #2 of 10 compared models
- 89th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HumanEval+, not total model capability
- 03IB
- Score
- 86.1%
- Speed
- Up to 50 tok/s via Replicate
Strengths
- Ranks #3 of 10 compared models
- 78th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HumanEval+, not total model capability
- 04
- Score
- 86.1%
- Speed
- Up to 50 tok/s via Replicate
Strengths
- Ranks #4 of 10 compared models
- 67th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HumanEval+, not total model capability
- 05MIPhi 4Microsoft
- Score
- 82.8%
- Price
- $0.13 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 33 tok/s via DeepInfra
Strengths
- Ranks #5 of 10 compared models
- 56th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HumanEval+, not total model capability
Selection summary
Best AI Models for HumanEval+
Phi 4 Reasoning currently leads HumanEval+ with 92.9%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What is HumanEval+?
What HumanEval+ measures and how its scores work.
Enhanced version of HumanEval that extends the original test cases by 80x using EvalPlus framework for rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code functional correctness, detecting previously undetected wrong code
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- HumanEval+
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- reasoning
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- humaneval+|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about HumanEval+.
Which model scores highest on HumanEval+?
Phi 4 Reasoning is currently ranked first with 92.9%.
What does HumanEval+ measure?
Enhanced version of HumanEval that extends the original test cases by 80x using EvalPlus framework for rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code functional correctness, detecting previously undetected wrong code
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
10 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.