math benchmark
HMMT Feb 26 Leaderboard
HMMT February 2026 is a math competition benchmark based on problems from the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament, testing advanced mathematical problem-solving and reasoning.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Models12
Model coverage12
MetricScore
EvidenceB
HMMT Feb 26 Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score97.1% | Percentile100.0% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelDE | Score95.2% | Percentile90.9% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelDE | Score94.8% | Percentile81.8% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score92.9% | Percentile72.7% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelMA | Score92.7% | Percentile63.6% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelZA | Score92.5% | Percentile54.5% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelDE | Score91.9% | Percentile45.5% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score87.8% | Percentile36.4% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelMI | Score84.9% | Percentile27.3% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelAC | Score84.3% | Percentile18.2% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelAC | Score83.6% | Percentile9.1% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelZA | Score82.6% | Percentile0.0% | Participants12 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
HMMT Feb 26 Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
HMMT Feb 26 Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for HMMT Feb 26
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis hmmt feb 26 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
- 01ACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
- Score
- 97.1%
- Price
- $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 5.8 tok/s via Together
Strengths
- Ranks #1 of 12 compared models
- 100th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HMMT Feb 26, not total model capability
- 02DEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeek
- Score
- 95.2%
- Price
- $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 18 tok/s via Fireworks
Strengths
- Ranks #2 of 12 compared models
- 91th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HMMT Feb 26, not total model capability
- 03DEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeek
- Score
- 94.8%
- Price
- $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 19 tok/s via Novita
Strengths
- Ranks #3 of 12 compared models
- 82th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HMMT Feb 26, not total model capability
- 04ACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
- Score
- 92.9%
- Price
- $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Strengths
- Ranks #4 of 12 compared models
- 73th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HMMT Feb 26, not total model capability
- 05MAKimi K2.6Moonshot AI
- Score
- 92.7%
- Price
- $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 285 tok/s via Fireworks
Strengths
- Ranks #5 of 12 compared models
- 64th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures HMMT Feb 26, not total model capability
Selection summary
Best AI Models for HMMT Feb 26
Qwen3.7 Max currently leads HMMT Feb 26 with 97.1%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What is HMMT Feb 26?
What HMMT Feb 26 measures and how its scores work.
HMMT February 2026 is a math competition benchmark based on problems from the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament, testing advanced mathematical problem-solving and reasoning.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- HMMT Feb 26
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- math
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- hmmt-feb-26|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about HMMT Feb 26.
Which model scores highest on HMMT Feb 26?
Qwen3.7 Max is currently ranked first with 97.1%.
What does HMMT Feb 26 measure?
HMMT February 2026 is a math competition benchmark based on problems from the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament, testing advanced mathematical problem-solving and reasoning.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
12 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.