llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

healthcare benchmark

HealthBench Professional Leaderboard

HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models9
Model coverage9
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

HealthBench Professional Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

9 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Fable 5AnthropicScore66.0%Percentile100.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore60.5%Percentile87.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 5AnthropicScore59.8%Percentile75.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelANClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicScore57.8%Percentile62.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore57.7%Percentile50.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore55.8%Percentile37.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore55.7%Percentile25.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelOPGPT-5.5 InstantOpenAIScore38.4%Percentile12.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelMIMAI-Thinking-1MicrosoftScore35.0%Percentile0.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

HealthBench Professional Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Claude Fable 566.0%Rank #2GPT-5.6 Sol60.5%Rank #3Claude Opus 559.8%Rank #4Claude Sonnet 557.8%

HealthBench Professional Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

HealthBench Professional

The Top AI Models for HealthBench Professional

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis healthbench professional AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Fable 5Anthropic
    Score
    66.0%
    Price
    $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 9.1 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 9 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  2. 02
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Score
    60.5%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 27 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 9 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Claude Opus 5Anthropic
    Score
    59.8%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 3.3 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 9 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AN
    Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
    Score
    57.8%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 11 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 9 compared models
    • 63th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability
  5. 05
    OP
    GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
    Score
    57.7%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 9 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures HealthBench Professional, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for HealthBench Professional

Claude Fable 5 currently leads HealthBench Professional with 66.0%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Claude Fable 566.0% · $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2GPT-5.6 Sol60.5% · $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Claude Opus 559.8% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens

What is HealthBench Professional?

What HealthBench Professional measures and how its scores work.

HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
HealthBench Professional
Modality
text
Primary category
healthcare
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
healthbench-professional|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about HealthBench Professional.

Which model scores highest on HealthBench Professional?

Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 66.0%.

What does HealthBench Professional measure?

HealthBench Professional evaluates model capability and safety for clinician use cases using real clinician-style chats and physician-authored grading rubrics.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

9 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.