healthcare benchmark
An open-source benchmark for measuring performance and safety of large language models in healthcare, consisting of 5,000 multi-turn conversations evaluated by 262 physicians using 48,562 unique rubric criteria across health contexts and behavioral dimensions
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 60.2% | 100.0% | 9 | C | |
| 02 | MA | 58.0% | 87.5% | 9 | C | |
| 03 | OP | 57.6% | 75.0% | 9 | C | |
| 04 | OP | 57.0% | 62.5% | 9 | C | |
| 05 | OP | 57.0% | 50.0% | 9 | C | |
| 06 | OP | 55.8% | 37.5% | 9 | C | |
| 07 | OP | 54.1% | 25.0% | 9 | C | |
| 08 | OP | 51.4% | 12.5% | 9 | C | |
| 09 | OP | 42.5% | 0.0% | 9 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What HealthBench measures and how its scores work.
An open-source benchmark for measuring performance and safety of large language models in healthcare, consisting of 5,000 multi-turn conversations evaluated by 262 physicians using 48,562 unique rubric criteria across health contexts and behavioral dimensions
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about HealthBench.
Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 60.2%.
An open-source benchmark for measuring performance and safety of large language models in healthcare, consisting of 5,000 multi-turn conversations evaluated by 262 physicians using 48,562 unique rubric criteria across health contexts and behavioral dimensions
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.