reasoning benchmark
FullStackBench zh
Chinese subset of FullStackBench for evaluating end-to-end software engineering and full-stack development capability.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB
FullStackBench zh Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 58.7% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 57.4% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 03 | AC | 55.0% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
FullStackBench zh Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
FullStackBench zh Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is FullStackBench zh?
What FullStackBench zh measures and how its scores work.
Chinese subset of FullStackBench for evaluating end-to-end software engineering and full-stack development capability.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- FullStackBench zh
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- reasoning
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- fullstackbench-zh|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about FullStackBench zh.
Which model scores highest on FullStackBench zh?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is currently ranked first with 58.7%.
What does FullStackBench zh measure?
Chinese subset of FullStackBench for evaluating end-to-end software engineering and full-stack development capability.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
3 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.