llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

FrontierSWE

FrontierSWE measures whether an agent can complete open-ended technical projects at the scale of hours to tens of hours, spanning systems optimization, large-scale code construction, and applied ML research. Performance is reported as a dominance score, where higher is better.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models15
Model coverage15
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

FrontierSWE Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

15 rows
Columns

Show columns

01ANClaude Fable 5Anthropic90.0%100.0%15BAug 11, 2026
02MAKimi K3Moonshot AI81.2%92.9%15CAug 11, 2026
03ANClaude Opus 4.8Anthropic75.0%85.7%15BAug 11, 2026
04ZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AI74.0%78.6%15BAug 11, 2026
05ACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team73.5%71.4%15CAug 11, 2026
06OPGPT-5.5OpenAI73.0%64.3%15BAug 11, 2026
07ANClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic63.0%57.1%15BAug 11, 2026
08ANClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic56.0%50.0%15BAug 11, 2026
09OPGPT-5.4OpenAI54.0%42.9%15BAug 11, 2026
10GOGemini 3.1 ProGoogle40.0%35.7%15BAug 11, 2026
11ZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AI31.0%28.6%15BAug 11, 2026
12DEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeek29.0%21.4%15BAug 11, 2026
13MAKimi K2.6Moonshot AI27.0%14.3%15BAug 11, 2026
14MAKimi K2.5Moonshot AI26.0%7.1%15BAug 11, 2026
15ACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team22.0%0.0%15BAug 11, 2026

FrontierSWE Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

FrontierSWE

FrontierSWE Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Claude Fable 590.0%Rank #2Kimi K381.2%Rank #3Claude Opus 4.875.0%Rank #4GLM-5.274.0%

What is FrontierSWE?

What FrontierSWE measures and how its scores work.

FrontierSWE measures whether an agent can complete open-ended technical projects at the scale of hours to tens of hours, spanning systems optimization, large-scale code construction, and applied ML research. Performance is reported as a dominance score, where higher is better.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
FrontierSWE
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
frontierswe|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about FrontierSWE.

Which model scores highest on FrontierSWE?

Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 90.0%.

What does FrontierSWE measure?

FrontierSWE measures whether an agent can complete open-ended technical projects at the scale of hours to tens of hours, spanning systems optimization, large-scale code construction, and applied ML research. Performance is reported as a dominance score, where higher is better.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

15 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.