reasoning benchmark
FrontierCode 1.1 evaluates whether coding-agent changes are mergeable, using unit tests, maintainer-defined rubrics, and verifiers. Runs flagged for unfair internet use receive a zero score.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AN | 53.5% | 100.0% | 15 | B | |
| 02 | AN | 53.4% | 92.9% | 15 | B | |
| 03 | OP | 47.5% | 85.7% | 15 | B | |
| 04 | AN | 46.5% | 78.6% | 15 | B | |
| 05 | OP | 43.0% | 71.4% | 15 | B | |
| 06 | AN | 42.7% | 64.3% | 15 | B | |
| 07 | XA | 42.4% | 57.1% | 15 | B | |
| 08 | OP | 41.3% | 50.0% | 15 | B | |
| 09 | OP | 39.8% | 42.9% | 15 | B | |
| 10 | AN | 38.5% | 35.7% | 15 | B | |
| 11 | MA | 30.1% | 28.6% | 15 | B | |
| 12 | ZA | 24.5% | 21.4% | 15 | B | |
| 13 | DE | 17.6% | 14.3% | 15 | B | |
| 14 | MI | 14.7% | 7.1% | 15 | B | |
| 15 | AC | 10.2% | 0.0% | 15 | B |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What FrontierCode 1.1 measures and how its scores work.
FrontierCode 1.1 evaluates whether coding-agent changes are mergeable, using unit tests, maintainer-defined rubrics, and verifiers. Runs flagged for unfair internet use receive a zero score.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about FrontierCode 1.1.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 53.5%.
FrontierCode 1.1 evaluates whether coding-agent changes are mergeable, using unit tests, maintainer-defined rubrics, and verifiers. Runs flagged for unfair internet use receive a zero score.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
15 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.