agents benchmark
FrontierSWE (Impl.)
FrontierSWE (Impl.) evaluates software engineering implementation ability and reports model ranking on implementation tasks. Lower rank is better.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models1
Model coverage1
MetricRank
EvidenceB
FrontierSWE (Impl.) Ranking
Lower rank ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | XI | 3.4 rank | 100.0% | 1 | C |
FrontierSWE (Impl.) Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is FrontierSWE (Impl.)?
What FrontierSWE (Impl.) measures and how its scores work.
FrontierSWE (Impl.) evaluates software engineering implementation ability and reports model ranking on implementation tasks. Lower rank is better.
Scores are shown in rank. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- FrontierSWE (Impl.)
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- agents
- Score direction
- lower
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- frontier-swe-impl|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about FrontierSWE (Impl.).
Which model scores highest on FrontierSWE (Impl.)?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is currently ranked first with 3.4 rank.
What does FrontierSWE (Impl.) measure?
FrontierSWE (Impl.) evaluates software engineering implementation ability and reports model ranking on implementation tasks. Lower rank is better.
Is a higher rank better?
No. Lower values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.