language benchmark
Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speech - a parallel speech dataset in 102 languages built on FLoRes-101 with approximately 12 hours of speech supervision per language for tasks including ASR, speech language identification, translation and retrieval. Scores are shown as speech recognition accuracy (1 - word error rate), so higher is better.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 95.9% | 100.0% | 6 | C | |
| 02 | GO | 93.6% | 80.0% | 6 | B | |
| 03 | GO | 93.3% | 60.0% | 6 | C | |
| 04 | GO | 93.1% | 40.0% | 6 | C | |
| 05 | GO | 90.4% | 20.0% | 6 | C | |
| 06 | GO | 86.4% | 0.0% | 6 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What FLEURS measures and how its scores work.
Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speech - a parallel speech dataset in 102 languages built on FLoRes-101 with approximately 12 hours of speech supervision per language for tasks including ASR, speech language identification, translation and retrieval. Scores are shown as speech recognition accuracy (1 - word error rate), so higher is better.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about FLEURS.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is currently ranked first with 95.9%.
Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speech - a parallel speech dataset in 102 languages built on FLoRes-101 with approximately 12 hours of speech supervision per language for tasks including ASR, speech language identification, translation and retrieval. Scores are shown as speech recognition accuracy (1 - word error rate), so higher is better.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
6 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.