math benchmark
A large-scale dataset for numerical reasoning over financial data with question-answering pairs written by financial experts, featuring complex numerical reasoning and understanding of heterogeneous representations with annotated gold reasoning programs for full explainability
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AM | 77.2% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 02 | AM | 73.6% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 03 | AM | 65.2% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What FinQA measures and how its scores work.
A large-scale dataset for numerical reasoning over financial data with question-answering pairs written by financial experts, featuring complex numerical reasoning and understanding of heterogeneous representations with annotated gold reasoning programs for full explainability
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about FinQA.
Nova Pro is currently ranked first with 77.2%.
A large-scale dataset for numerical reasoning over financial data with question-answering pairs written by financial experts, featuring complex numerical reasoning and understanding of heterogeneous representations with annotated gold reasoning programs for full explainability
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.