long context benchmark
A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding consisting of over 5000 human curated multiple choice questions based on 3-minute video clips from Ego4D, covering a broad range of natural human activities and behaviors
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 77.9% | 100.0% | 9 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 76.2% | 87.5% | 9 | C | |
| 03 | OP | 72.2% | 75.0% | 9 | C | |
| 04 | AM | 72.1% | 62.5% | 9 | C | |
| 05 | GO | 71.5% | 50.0% | 9 | C | |
| 06 | AM | 71.4% | 37.5% | 9 | C | |
| 07 | AC | 68.6% | 25.0% | 9 | C | |
| 08 | GO | 67.2% | 12.5% | 9 | C | |
| 09 | GO | 55.7% | 0.0% | 9 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What EgoSchema measures and how its scores work.
A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding consisting of over 5000 human curated multiple choice questions based on 3-minute video clips from Ego4D, covering a broad range of natural human activities and behaviors
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about EgoSchema.
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is currently ranked first with 77.9%.
A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding consisting of over 5000 human curated multiple choice questions based on 3-minute video clips from Ego4D, covering a broad range of natural human activities and behaviors
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.