llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

ECLeKTic Leaderboard

A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ECLeKTic Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelGOGemma 3n E4B InstructedGoogleScore19.0%Percentile100.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemma 3 27BGoogleScore16.7%Percentile85.7%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelGOGemma 3 12BGoogleScore10.3%Percentile71.4%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelGOGemma 3 4BGoogleScore4.6%Percentile57.1%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemma 3n E2B InstructedGoogleScore2.5%Percentile42.9%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelGOGemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)GoogleScore2.5%Percentile28.6%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelGOGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT PreviewGoogleScore1.9%Percentile14.3%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelGOGemma 3 1BGoogleScore1.4%Percentile0.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

ECLeKTic Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Gemma 3n E4B Instructed19.0%Rank #2Gemma 3 27B16.7%Rank #3Gemma 3 12B10.3%Rank #4Gemma 3 4B4.6%

ECLeKTic Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ECLeKTic

The Top AI Models for ECLeKTic

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis eclektic AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    GO
    Gemma 3n E4B InstructedGoogle
    Score
    19.0%
    Speed
    Up to 42 tok/s via Together

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ECLeKTic, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemma 3 27BGoogle
    Score
    16.7%
    Speed
    Up to 33 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ECLeKTic, not total model capability
  3. 03
    GO
    Gemma 3 12BGoogle
    Score
    10.3%
    Speed
    Up to 33 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ECLeKTic, not total model capability
  4. 04
    GO
    Gemma 3 4BGoogle
    Score
    4.6%
    Speed
    Up to 33 tok/s via DeepInfra

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ECLeKTic, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Gemma 3n E2B InstructedGoogle
    Score
    2.5%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ECLeKTic, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ECLeKTic

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed currently leads ECLeKTic with 19.0%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Gemma 3n E4B Instructed19.0% · Up to 42 tok/s via TogetherBenchmark rank #2Gemma 3 27B16.7% · Up to 33 tok/s via DeepInfraBenchmark rank #3Gemma 3 12B10.3% · Up to 33 tok/s via DeepInfra

What is ECLeKTic?

What ECLeKTic measures and how its scores work.

A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ECLeKTic
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
eclektic|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ECLeKTic.

Which model scores highest on ECLeKTic?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is currently ranked first with 19.0%.

What does ECLeKTic measure?

A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.