llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

DeepSWE 1.1

DeepSWE 1.1 evaluates software engineering agents using the mini-swe-agent harness.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models20
Model coverage20
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

DeepSWE 1.1 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

20 rows
Columns

Show columns

01OPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI73.0%100.0%20BAug 11, 2026
02ANClaude Fable 5Anthropic70.0%94.7%20BAug 11, 2026
03OPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI70.0%89.5%20BAug 11, 2026
04MAKimi K3Moonshot AI69.0%84.2%20BAug 11, 2026
05ANClaude Opus 5Anthropic68.8%79.0%20CAug 11, 2026
06OPGPT-5.5OpenAI67.0%73.7%20BAug 11, 2026
07OPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI67.0%68.4%20BAug 11, 2026
08MEMuse Spark 1.2Meta59.3%63.2%20CAug 11, 2026
09ANClaude Opus 4.8Anthropic59.0%57.9%20BAug 11, 2026
10ACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team56.6%52.6%20CAug 11, 2026
11ANClaude Sonnet 5Anthropic54.0%47.4%20BAug 11, 2026
12XAGrok 4.5xAI54.0%42.1%20BAug 11, 2026
13MEMuse Spark 1.1Meta53.0%36.8%20BAug 11, 2026
14OPGPT-5.4OpenAI52.0%31.6%20BAug 11, 2026
15GOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogle49.0%26.3%20BAug 11, 2026
16ZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AI44.0%21.1%20BAug 11, 2026
17GOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogle37.0%15.8%20BAug 11, 2026
18MAKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI31.0%10.5%20BAug 11, 2026
19ANClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic30.0%5.3%20BAug 11, 2026
20GOGemini 3.1 ProGoogle12.0%0.0%20BAug 11, 2026

DeepSWE 1.1 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

DeepSWE 1.1

DeepSWE 1.1 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol73.0%Rank #2Claude Fable 570.0%Rank #3GPT-5.6 Terra70.0%Rank #4Kimi K369.0%

What is DeepSWE 1.1?

What DeepSWE 1.1 measures and how its scores work.

DeepSWE 1.1 evaluates software engineering agents using the mini-swe-agent harness.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
DeepSWE 1.1
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
deepswe-1.1|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSWE 1.1.

Which model scores highest on DeepSWE 1.1?

GPT-5.6 Sol is currently ranked first with 73.0%.

What does DeepSWE 1.1 measure?

DeepSWE 1.1 evaluates software engineering agents using the mini-swe-agent harness.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

20 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.