language benchmark
Chinese SimpleQA is the first comprehensive Chinese benchmark to evaluate the factuality ability of language models to answer short questions. It contains 3,000 high-quality questions spanning 6 major topics with 99 diverse subtopics, designed to assess Chinese factual knowledge across humanities, science, engineering, culture, and society.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | DE | 84.4% | 100.0% | 7 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 84.3% | 83.3% | 7 | C | |
| 03 | AC | 83.4% | 66.7% | 7 | C | |
| 04 | DE | 78.9% | 50.0% | 7 | C | |
| 05 | MA | 78.4% | 33.3% | 7 | C | |
| 06 | MA | 77.6% | 16.7% | 7 | C | |
| 07 | DE | 64.8% | 0.0% | 7 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What CSimpleQA measures and how its scores work.
Chinese SimpleQA is the first comprehensive Chinese benchmark to evaluate the factuality ability of language models to answer short questions. It contains 3,000 high-quality questions spanning 6 major topics with 99 diverse subtopics, designed to assess Chinese factual knowledge across humanities, science, engineering, culture, and society.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about CSimpleQA.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is currently ranked first with 84.4%.
Chinese SimpleQA is the first comprehensive Chinese benchmark to evaluate the factuality ability of language models to answer short questions. It contains 3,000 high-quality questions spanning 6 major topics with 99 diverse subtopics, designed to assess Chinese factual knowledge across humanities, science, engineering, culture, and society.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
7 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.