reasoning benchmark
CRUXEval-Input-CoT
CRUXEval input prediction task with Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting. Part of the CRUXEval benchmark for code reasoning, understanding, and execution evaluation. Given a Python function and its expected output, the task is to predict the appropriate input using chain-of-thought reasoning. Consists of 800 Python functions (3-13 lines) designed to evaluate code comprehension and reasoning capabilities.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB
CRUXEval-Input-CoT Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 56.5% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
CRUXEval-Input-CoT Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is CRUXEval-Input-CoT?
What CRUXEval-Input-CoT measures and how its scores work.
CRUXEval input prediction task with Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting. Part of the CRUXEval benchmark for code reasoning, understanding, and execution evaluation. Given a Python function and its expected output, the task is to predict the appropriate input using chain-of-thought reasoning. Consists of 800 Python functions (3-13 lines) designed to evaluate code comprehension and reasoning capabilities.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- CRUXEval-Input-CoT
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- reasoning
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- cruxeval-input-cot|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about CRUXEval-Input-CoT.
Which model scores highest on CRUXEval-Input-CoT?
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is currently ranked first with 56.5%.
What does CRUXEval-Input-CoT measure?
CRUXEval input prediction task with Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting. Part of the CRUXEval benchmark for code reasoning, understanding, and execution evaluation. Given a Python function and its expected output, the task is to predict the appropriate input using chain-of-thought reasoning. Consists of 800 Python functions (3-13 lines) designed to evaluate code comprehension and reasoning capabilities.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.