math benchmark
CritPT
CritPT is a challenging reasoning benchmark reported by Qwen for evaluating frontier mathematical and critical problem-solving capability.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB
CritPT Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | ZA | 16.7% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 11.4% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 03 | AC | 6.0% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 04 | NV | 3.1% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
CritPT Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
CritPT Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is CritPT?
What CritPT measures and how its scores work.
CritPT is a challenging reasoning benchmark reported by Qwen for evaluating frontier mathematical and critical problem-solving capability.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- CritPT
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- math
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- critpt|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about CritPT.
Which model scores highest on CritPT?
GLM-5.2 is currently ranked first with 16.7%.
What does CritPT measure?
CritPT is a challenging reasoning benchmark reported by Qwen for evaluating frontier mathematical and critical problem-solving capability.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
4 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.