llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

Claw-Eval

Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models13
Model coverage13
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

Claw-Eval Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

13 rows
Columns

Show columns

01MAKimi K2.6Moonshot AI80.9%100.0%13CAug 11, 2026
02ZAGLM-5V-TurboZhipu AI75.0%91.7%13CAug 11, 2026
03MIMiniMax M3MiniMax74.5%83.3%13CAug 11, 2026
04TEHy3Tencent68.5%75.0%13CAug 11, 2026
05ACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team65.2%66.7%13CAug 11, 2026
06XIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi64.0%58.3%13CAug 11, 2026
07XIMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi63.2%50.0%13CAug 11, 2026
08ACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team62.7%41.7%13CAug 11, 2026
09XIMiMo-V2-ProXiaomi61.5%33.3%13CAug 11, 2026
10ACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team60.6%25.0%13CAug 11, 2026
11ACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team58.7%16.7%13CAug 11, 2026
12XIMiMo-V2-OmniXiaomi54.8%8.3%13CAug 11, 2026
13ACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team50.0%0.0%13CAug 11, 2026

Claw-Eval Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Claw-Eval

Claw-Eval Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Kimi K2.680.9%Rank #2GLM-5V-Turbo75.0%Rank #3MiniMax M374.5%Rank #4Hy368.5%

What is Claw-Eval?

What Claw-Eval measures and how its scores work.

Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Claw-Eval
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
claw-eval|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Claw-Eval.

Which model scores highest on Claw-Eval?

Kimi K2.6 is currently ranked first with 80.9%.

What does Claw-Eval measure?

Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

13 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.