agents benchmark
Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | MA | 80.9% | 100.0% | 13 | C | |
| 02 | ZA | 75.0% | 91.7% | 13 | C | |
| 03 | MI | 74.5% | 83.3% | 13 | C | |
| 04 | TE | 68.5% | 75.0% | 13 | C | |
| 05 | AC | 65.2% | 66.7% | 13 | C | |
| 06 | XI | 64.0% | 58.3% | 13 | C | |
| 07 | XI | 63.2% | 50.0% | 13 | C | |
| 08 | AC | 62.7% | 41.7% | 13 | C | |
| 09 | XI | 61.5% | 33.3% | 13 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 60.6% | 25.0% | 13 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 58.7% | 16.7% | 13 | C | |
| 12 | XI | 54.8% | 8.3% | 13 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 50.0% | 0.0% | 13 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What Claw-Eval measures and how its scores work.
Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Claw-Eval.
Kimi K2.6 is currently ranked first with 80.9%.
Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.