llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

memory benchmark

CI Memories Violation Rate Leaderboard

CI Memories measures privacy failures in memory-enabled agents using contextual-integrity scenarios. This metric is the violation rate; lower is better.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

CI Memories Violation Rate Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore26.4%Percentile100.0%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

CI Memories Violation Rate Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Muse Glimmer-30B26.4%

The Top AI Models for CI Memories Violation Rate

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis ci memories violation rate AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse Glimmer-30BMeta
    Score
    26.4%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures CI Memories Violation Rate, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for CI Memories Violation Rate

Muse Glimmer-30B currently leads CI Memories Violation Rate with 26.4%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Muse Glimmer-30B26.4%

What is CI Memories Violation Rate?

What CI Memories Violation Rate measures and how its scores work.

CI Memories measures privacy failures in memory-enabled agents using contextual-integrity scenarios. This metric is the violation rate; lower is better.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
CI Memories Violation Rate
Modality
text
Primary category
memory
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
ci-memories-violation|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about CI Memories Violation Rate.

Which model scores highest on CI Memories Violation Rate?

Muse Glimmer-30B is currently ranked first with 26.4%.

What does CI Memories Violation Rate measure?

CI Memories measures privacy failures in memory-enabled agents using contextual-integrity scenarios. This metric is the violation rate; lower is better.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.