reasoning benchmark
BrowseComp is a benchmark for measuring the ability of agents to browse the web, comprising 1,266 questions that require persistently navigating the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers. The benchmark focuses on questions where answers are obscure, time-invariant, and well-supported by evidence scattered across the open web.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | OP | 89.8% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 02 | OP | 88.8% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What BrowseComp Long Context 256k measures and how its scores work.
BrowseComp is a benchmark for measuring the ability of agents to browse the web, comprising 1,266 questions that require persistently navigating the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers. The benchmark focuses on questions where answers are obscure, time-invariant, and well-supported by evidence scattered across the open web.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about BrowseComp Long Context 256k.
GPT-5.2 is currently ranked first with 89.8%.
BrowseComp is a benchmark for measuring the ability of agents to browse the web, comprising 1,266 questions that require persistently navigating the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers. The benchmark focuses on questions where answers are obscure, time-invariant, and well-supported by evidence scattered across the open web.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.