reasoning benchmark
A challenging benchmark for evaluating web browsing agents' ability to persistently navigate the internet and find hard-to-locate, entangled information. Comprises 1,266 questions requiring strategic reasoning, creative search, and interpretation of retrieved content, with short and easily verifiable answers.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | OP | 92.0% | 100.0% | 5 | C | |
| 02 | OP | 90.0% | 75.0% | 5 | C | |
| 03 | OP | 90.0% | 50.0% | 5 | C | |
| 04 | OP | 90.0% | 25.0% | 5 | C | |
| 05 | OP | 90.0% | 0.0% | 5 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What BrowseComp Long Context 128k measures and how its scores work.
A challenging benchmark for evaluating web browsing agents' ability to persistently navigate the internet and find hard-to-locate, entangled information. Comprises 1,266 questions requiring strategic reasoning, creative search, and interpretation of retrieved content, with short and easily verifiable answers.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about BrowseComp Long Context 128k.
GPT-5.2 is currently ranked first with 92.0%.
A challenging benchmark for evaluating web browsing agents' ability to persistently navigate the internet and find hard-to-locate, entangled information. Comprises 1,266 questions requiring strategic reasoning, creative search, and interpretation of retrieved content, with short and easily verifiable answers.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.