reasoning benchmark
BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH) is a challenging benchmark that replaces each task in BIG-Bench Hard with a novel task that probes similar reasoning capabilities but exhibits significantly increased difficulty. The benchmark contains 23 tasks testing diverse reasoning skills including many-hop reasoning, causal understanding, spatial reasoning, temporal arithmetic, geometric reasoning, linguistic reasoning, logic puzzles, and humor understanding. Designed to address saturation on existing benchmarks where state-of-the-art models achieve near-perfect scores, BBEH shows substantial room for improvement with best models achieving only 9.8-44.8% average accuracy.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelGO | Score74.4% | Percentile100.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelGO | Score64.8% | Percentile90.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelGO | Score53.0% | Percentile80.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelGO | Score47.6% | Percentile70.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelGO | Score33.1% | Percentile60.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelGO | Score21.9% | Percentile50.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelGO | Score19.3% | Percentile40.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelGO | Score16.3% | Percentile30.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelGO | Score15.0% | Percentile20.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelGO | Score11.0% | Percentile10.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Score7.2% | Percentile0.0% | Participants11 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis big-bench extra hard AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Gemma 4 31B currently leads BIG-Bench Extra Hard with 74.4%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What BIG-Bench Extra Hard measures and how its scores work.
BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH) is a challenging benchmark that replaces each task in BIG-Bench Hard with a novel task that probes similar reasoning capabilities but exhibits significantly increased difficulty. The benchmark contains 23 tasks testing diverse reasoning skills including many-hop reasoning, causal understanding, spatial reasoning, temporal arithmetic, geometric reasoning, linguistic reasoning, logic puzzles, and humor understanding. Designed to address saturation on existing benchmarks where state-of-the-art models achieve near-perfect scores, BBEH shows substantial room for improvement with best models achieving only 9.8-44.8% average accuracy.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about BIG-Bench Extra Hard.
Gemma 4 31B is currently ranked first with 74.4%.
BIG-Bench Extra Hard (BBEH) is a challenging benchmark that replaces each task in BIG-Bench Hard with a novel task that probes similar reasoning capabilities but exhibits significantly increased difficulty. The benchmark contains 23 tasks testing diverse reasoning skills including many-hop reasoning, causal understanding, spatial reasoning, temporal arithmetic, geometric reasoning, linguistic reasoning, logic puzzles, and humor understanding. Designed to address saturation on existing benchmarks where state-of-the-art models achieve near-perfect scores, BBEH shows substantial room for improvement with best models achieving only 9.8-44.8% average accuracy.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
11 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.