agents benchmark
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard V4 (BFCL-V4) evaluates LLMs on their ability to accurately call functions and APIs, including simple, multiple, parallel, and nested function calls across diverse programming scenarios.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 75.0% | 100.0% | 13 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 72.9% | 91.7% | 13 | C | |
| 03 | AC | 72.9% | 83.3% | 13 | C | |
| 04 | AC | 72.2% | 75.0% | 13 | C | |
| 05 | AC | 68.5% | 66.7% | 13 | C | |
| 06 | AC | 67.3% | 58.3% | 13 | C | |
| 07 | AC | 66.1% | 50.0% | 13 | C | |
| 08 | AM | 61.6% | 41.7% | 13 | C | |
| 09 | AM | 60.3% | 33.3% | 13 | C | |
| 10 | AM | 58.3% | 25.0% | 13 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 50.3% | 16.7% | 13 | C | |
| 12 | AC | 43.6% | 8.3% | 13 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 25.3% | 0.0% | 13 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What BFCL-V4 measures and how its scores work.
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard V4 (BFCL-V4) evaluates LLMs on their ability to accurately call functions and APIs, including simple, multiple, parallel, and nested function calls across diverse programming scenarios.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about BFCL-V4.
Qwen3.7 Max is currently ranked first with 75.0%.
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard V4 (BFCL-V4) evaluates LLMs on their ability to accurately call functions and APIs, including simple, multiple, parallel, and nested function calls across diverse programming scenarios.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.