llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BFCL v2

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

BFCL v2 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

01MELlama 3.3 70B InstructMeta77.3%100.0%5CAug 11, 2026
02NVLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1NVIDIA74.1%75.0%5CAug 11, 2026
03NVLlama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1NVIDIA73.7%50.0%5CAug 11, 2026
04MELlama 3.2 3B InstructMeta67.0%25.0%5CAug 11, 2026
05NVLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1NVIDIA63.6%0.0%5CAug 11, 2026

BFCL v2 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BFCL v2

BFCL v2 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct77.3%Rank #2Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v174.1%Rank #3Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v173.7%Rank #4Llama 3.2 3B Instruct67.0%

What is BFCL v2?

What BFCL v2 measures and how its scores work.

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BFCL v2
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
bfcl-v2|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BFCL v2.

Which model scores highest on BFCL v2?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is currently ranked first with 77.3%.

What does BFCL v2 measure?

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.