llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BFCL

The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) is the first comprehensive and executable function call evaluation dedicated to assessing Large Language Models' ability to invoke functions. It evaluates serial and parallel function calls across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, REST API) using a novel Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) evaluation method. The benchmark consists of over 2,000 question-function-answer pairs covering diverse application domains and complex use cases including multiple function calls, parallel function calls, and multi-turn interactions.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models11
Model coverage11
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

BFCL Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

11 rows
Columns

Show columns

01MELlama 3.1 405B InstructMeta88.5%100.0%11CAug 11, 2026
02MELlama 3.1 70B InstructMeta84.8%90.0%11CAug 11, 2026
03MELlama 3.1 8B InstructMeta76.1%80.0%11CAug 11, 2026
04AMNova 2 SonicAmazon74.5%70.0%11CAug 11, 2026
05ACQwen3 235B A22BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team70.8%60.0%11CAug 11, 2026
06ACQwen3 32BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team70.3%50.0%11CAug 11, 2026
07ACQwen3 30B A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team69.1%40.0%11CAug 11, 2026
08AMNova ProAmazon68.4%30.0%11CAug 11, 2026
09AMNova LiteAmazon66.6%20.0%11CAug 11, 2026
10ACQwQ-32BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team66.4%10.0%11CAug 11, 2026
11AMNova MicroAmazon56.2%0.0%11CAug 11, 2026

BFCL Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BFCL

BFCL Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Llama 3.1 405B Instruct88.5%Rank #2Llama 3.1 70B Instruct84.8%Rank #3Llama 3.1 8B Instruct76.1%Rank #4Nova 2 Sonic74.5%

What is BFCL?

What BFCL measures and how its scores work.

The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) is the first comprehensive and executable function call evaluation dedicated to assessing Large Language Models' ability to invoke functions. It evaluates serial and parallel function calls across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, REST API) using a novel Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) evaluation method. The benchmark consists of over 2,000 question-function-answer pairs covering diverse application domains and complex use cases including multiple function calls, parallel function calls, and multi-turn interactions.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BFCL
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
bfcl|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BFCL.

Which model scores highest on BFCL?

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is currently ranked first with 88.5%.

What does BFCL measure?

The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) is the first comprehensive and executable function call evaluation dedicated to assessing Large Language Models' ability to invoke functions. It evaluates serial and parallel function calls across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript, REST API) using a novel Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) evaluation method. The benchmark consists of over 2,000 question-function-answer pairs covering diverse application domains and complex use cases including multiple function calls, parallel function calls, and multi-turn interactions.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

11 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.