reasoning benchmark
The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelXI | Score97.2% | Percentile100.0% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelME | Score96.9% | Percentile97.0% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAN | Score96.4% | Percentile93.9% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelME | Score94.8% | Percentile90.9% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAM | Score94.8% | Percentile87.9% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAN | Score93.2% | Percentile84.8% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAL | Score93.0% | Percentile81.8% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAM | Score92.4% | Percentile78.8% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelMA | Score91.3% | Percentile75.8% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelMI | Score91.0% | Percentile72.7% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelAM | Score90.2% | Percentile69.7% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelAN | Score89.2% | Percentile66.7% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelAL | Score85.7% | Percentile63.6% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelMI | Score84.6% | Percentile60.6% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelMI | Score83.7% | Percentile57.6% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelME | Score83.4% | Percentile54.5% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelME | Score78.6% | Percentile51.5% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelMA | Score71.9% | Percentile48.5% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelGO | Score71.4% | Percentile45.5% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelCO | Score71.0% | Percentile42.4% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelAC | Score70.5% | Percentile39.4% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelAC | Score70.4% | Percentile36.4% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank23 | ModelNV | Score69.2% | Percentile33.3% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank24 | ModelAC | Score68.9% | Percentile30.3% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank25 | ModelGO | Score68.4% | Percentile27.3% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank26 | ModelAC | Score67.3% | Percentile24.2% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank27 | ModelNR | Score65.5% | Percentile21.2% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank28 | ModelGO | Score61.6% | Percentile18.2% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank29 | ModelGO | Score61.6% | Percentile15.2% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank30 | ModelAC | Score60.9% | Percentile12.1% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank31 | ModelGO | Score51.7% | Percentile9.1% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank32 | ModelGO | Score51.7% | Percentile6.1% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank33 | ModelIB | Score50.8% | Percentile3.0% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank34 | ModelBA | Score40.6% | Percentile0.0% | Participants34 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis arc-c AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
MiMo-V2.5-Pro currently leads ARC-C with 97.2%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What ARC-C measures and how its scores work.
The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about ARC-C.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is currently ranked first with 97.2%.
The AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) Challenge Set is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark containing grade-school level science questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities. ARC-C specifically contains questions that were answered incorrectly by both retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making it a particularly challenging subset designed to test commonsense reasoning abilities in AI systems.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
34 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.