reasoning benchmark
A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs that evaluates API planning, retrieval, and calling capabilities. Contains 314 tool-use dialogues with 753 API calls across 73 API tools, designed to assess how effectively LLMs can utilize external tools and overcome obstacles in tool leveraging.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | ME | 92.0% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 02 | ME | 90.0% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 03 | ME | 82.6% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What API-Bank measures and how its scores work.
A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs that evaluates API planning, retrieval, and calling capabilities. Contains 314 tool-use dialogues with 753 API calls across 73 API tools, designed to assess how effectively LLMs can utilize external tools and overcome obstacles in tool leveraging.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about API-Bank.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is currently ranked first with 92.0%.
A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs that evaluates API planning, retrieval, and calling capabilities. Contains 314 tool-use dialogues with 753 API calls across 73 API tools, designed to assess how effectively LLMs can utilize external tools and overcome obstacles in tool leveraging.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.