math benchmark
American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024, consisting of 30 challenging mathematical reasoning problems from AIME I and AIME II competitions. Each problem requires an integer answer between 0-999 and tests advanced mathematical reasoning across algebra, geometry, combinatorics, and number theory. Used as a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models at Olympiad-level difficulty.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelXA | Score95.8% | Percentile100.0% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelOP | Score93.4% | Percentile98.1% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelXA | Score93.3% | Percentile96.2% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelME | Score93.3% | Percentile94.2% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelGO | Score92.0% | Percentile92.3% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelOP | Score91.6% | Percentile90.4% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelDE | Score91.4% | Percentile88.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelZA | Score91.0% | Percentile86.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelMA | Score89.8% | Percentile84.6% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelZA | Score89.4% | Percentile82.7% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Score88.0% | Percentile80.8% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelOP | Score87.3% | Percentile78.8% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelDE | Score86.7% | Percentile76.9% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelDE | Score86.7% | Percentile75.0% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelMI | Score86.0% | Percentile73.1% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelMA | Score86.0% | Percentile71.2% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelOP | Score86.0% | Percentile69.2% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelAC | Score85.7% | Percentile67.3% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelOP | Score83.8% | Percentile65.4% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelDE | Score83.3% | Percentile63.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelDE | Score83.3% | Percentile61.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelMI | Score83.3% | Percentile59.6% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank23 | ModelAC | Score81.4% | Percentile57.7% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank24 | ModelMI | Score81.3% | Percentile55.8% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank25 | ModelIB | Score81.2% | Percentile53.9% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank26 | ModelIB | Score81.2% | Percentile51.9% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank27 | ModelAC | Score80.4% | Percentile50.0% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank28 | ModelAN | Score80.0% | Percentile48.1% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank29 | ModelDE | Score80.0% | Percentile46.1% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank30 | ModelDE | Score80.0% | Percentile44.2% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank31 | ModelAC | Score79.5% | Percentile42.3% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank32 | ModelMA | Score77.5% | Percentile40.4% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank33 | ModelMA | Score77.5% | Percentile38.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank34 | ModelMI | Score75.3% | Percentile36.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank35 | ModelOP | Score74.3% | Percentile34.6% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank36 | ModelMA | Score73.6% | Percentile32.7% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank37 | ModelGO | Score73.3% | Percentile30.8% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank38 | ModelME | Score72.2% | Percentile28.9% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank39 | ModelMA | Score72.0% | Percentile26.9% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank40 | ModelMA | Score70.7% | Percentile25.0% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank41 | ModelMA | Score69.6% | Percentile23.1% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank42 | ModelMA | Score69.6% | Percentile21.1% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank43 | ModelDE | Score66.3% | Percentile19.2% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank44 | ModelDE | Score59.4% | Percentile17.3% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank45 | ModelDE | Score52.7% | Percentile15.4% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank46 | ModelAC | Score50.0% | Percentile13.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank47 | ModelOP | Score49.6% | Percentile11.5% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank48 | ModelOP | Score48.1% | Percentile9.6% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank49 | ModelOP | Score42.0% | Percentile7.7% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank50 | ModelDE | Score39.2% | Percentile5.8% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank51 | ModelOP | Score36.7% | Percentile3.9% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank52 | ModelOP | Score29.4% | Percentile1.9% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank53 | ModelOP | Score13.1% | Percentile0.0% | Participants53 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis aime 2024 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Grok-3 Mini currently leads AIME 2024 with 95.8%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What AIME 2024 measures and how its scores work.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024, consisting of 30 challenging mathematical reasoning problems from AIME I and AIME II competitions. Each problem requires an integer answer between 0-999 and tests advanced mathematical reasoning across algebra, geometry, combinatorics, and number theory. Used as a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models at Olympiad-level difficulty.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about AIME 2024.
Grok-3 Mini is currently ranked first with 95.8%.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024, consisting of 30 challenging mathematical reasoning problems from AIME I and AIME II competitions. Each problem requires an integer answer between 0-999 and tests advanced mathematical reasoning across algebra, geometry, combinatorics, and number theory. Used as a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models at Olympiad-level difficulty.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
53 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.