llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Aider

Aider is a comprehensive code editing benchmark based on 133 practice exercises from Exercism's Python repository, designed to evaluate AI models' ability to translate natural language coding requests into executable code that passes unit tests. The benchmark measures end-to-end code editing capabilities, including GPT's ability to edit existing code and format code changes for automated saving to local files. The Aider Polyglot variant extends this evaluation across 225 challenging exercises spanning C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Rust, making it a standard benchmark for assessing multilingual code editing performance in AI research.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

Aider Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

4 rows
Columns

Show columns

01DEDeepSeek-V2.5DeepSeek72.2%100.0%4CAug 11, 2026
02ACQwen3 235B A22BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team61.8%66.7%4CAug 11, 2026
03ACQwen2.5-Coder 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team55.6%33.3%4CAug 11, 2026
04ACQwen3 32BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team50.2%0.0%4CAug 11, 2026

Aider Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Aider

Aider Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1DeepSeek-V2.572.2%Rank #2Qwen3 235B A22B61.8%Rank #3Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct55.6%Rank #4Qwen3 32B50.2%

What is Aider?

What Aider measures and how its scores work.

Aider is a comprehensive code editing benchmark based on 133 practice exercises from Exercism's Python repository, designed to evaluate AI models' ability to translate natural language coding requests into executable code that passes unit tests. The benchmark measures end-to-end code editing capabilities, including GPT's ability to edit existing code and format code changes for automated saving to local files. The Aider Polyglot variant extends this evaluation across 225 challenging exercises spanning C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Rust, making it a standard benchmark for assessing multilingual code editing performance in AI research.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Aider
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
aider|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Aider.

Which model scores highest on Aider?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is currently ranked first with 72.2%.

What does Aider measure?

Aider is a comprehensive code editing benchmark based on 133 practice exercises from Exercism's Python repository, designed to evaluate AI models' ability to translate natural language coding requests into executable code that passes unit tests. The benchmark measures end-to-end code editing capabilities, including GPT's ability to edit existing code and format code changes for automated saving to local files. The Aider Polyglot variant extends this evaluation across 225 challenging exercises spanning C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Rust, making it a standard benchmark for assessing multilingual code editing performance in AI research.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

4 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.